The relation between House Bill 688 and bail bonds

Bail Bonds In New York

If it wasn’t for House Bill 688, you would not have to pay an additional charge of $35 in order to get out of jail and seek freedom; however, whether you like it or not, May 16 has already changed the way you have always seen bail bonds. Not to mention, the court fee has also increased and therefore, posting a bail is no longer a cakewalk, at least not in terms of the money involved. Interestingly, the Alabama Bail Bonding Association did do its bit and even tried to oppose the bill, but as you already know, all the efforts went in vain and the House Bill 688 finally got passed amid much speculation. But, now that things have changed, you are not the only one who would get affected; smaller bond companies are also likely to face the music and many of them may even bite the dust.

Well, if you are not in Alabama, this piece of news and the repercussions that it has led to may not necessarily affect you, but there are some things which might, with ‘Reassumption of Liability’ being one of them. As a matter of fact, it is imperative for you to be familiar with this letter or affidavit, as some people call it, especially when to fail to honor your promise of appearing in court and facing the trial. At the same time, it is advisable that you understand the role played by your bondsman; they may be primarily responsible for posting bail with the aid of bail bonds, but if they charge you more than once and then call it “annual premium”, you may want to look for another bondsman if you are convinced that your case, especially if there is felony involved, is unlikely to wrap up within the first year itself.